IN 2004 WHEN I APPLIED FOR GR B AFTER 5 YRS SERVICE IN TBOP(LSG) RULES WERE CHANGED SAYING LSG WAS  DIFFERENT FROM TBOP AND I WAS NOT ALLOWED.I.E. SINCE (ABOUT) FROM 1996 TO 2003 TBOP=LSG THEN NOT.CAT CHENNAI REBUKED THE DEPT FOR WRONG /FALSE CLARIFICATIONS .THOSE (TBOP+5)WHO WROTE &PASSED TILL 2003 BECAME SPS.DEPT DID NOT FOLLOW CAT .CASE  WAS SAID TO BE IN SUPREME COURT BY OUR UNION.
BUT NOW IT IS LEARNT NOTHING IS THERE.IF WE WERE TOLD CORRECT POSITION ALL OF US COULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED FOR SLP.UNNECESSARY CASES DIVERTED THE UNION.HOPING FOR GR-B SLP MANY DID NOT WRITE  FTP. FTP ALSO WAS CANCELLED AFTER MAKING 400 JUNIORS AS SENIORS. (TN)THUS SENIORS ARE LEFT IN LURCH.NOW 5YRS SERVICE  CAN MAKE ONE AS LSG.THE TBOPS (WITH 5 YRS SERVICE) IN 2004 WHO WERE DEPRIVED GR B ARE NOW WITH 32YRS SERVICE STILL WITHOUT EVEN LSG &LIKELY TO SERVE UNDER 5YRS SERVICE STAFF.THEY HAVE TO COMPETE WITH 5YRS -STAFF FOR GR 1.TILL RETIREMENT THEY CAN NOT WRITE GR B OR GR 111 ETC
I SUGGESTED THAT 10YRS FOR LSG 20YRS FOR HSG11 30 YRS FOR HSG 1 EXAMS AS A CONSOLATION.SENIORS ARE SIMPLY SPOILED

IN POS ONLY RLS BOOKED ARE AVAILABLE IN MIS STATISTICS.HEAVY NO.OF RLS RECEIVED PREPAID THRO JOURNALS ARE  UPLOADED IN DESPATCH MODULE.BUT THOUSANDS OF RLS RECEIVED THRO JOURNAL SO,ARE NOT INCLUDED IN MIS OR ANY STATISTICS.THIS IS A CHEATING CREATING OVERLOAD.THIS WAS BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF PTC MYSORE AND RO.
PTC SAYS IT CAN NOT DO WITHOUT DG'S ORDERS? DID DG WANTED PTC TO OMIT JOURNAL RLS IN STATISTICS?
RO SUGGESTED TO ISSUE RECEIPT TO JOURNALS.THIS WILL NEED MORE TIME CLERKS/MPCM RECEIPT BUNDLES COMPUTER SCANNER /KEEPING THE PUBLIC WAITING FOR HOURS DEFEATING THE PURPOSE OF JOURNAL SYSTEM.IN THE NEW VERSION BARCODE IS COMPULSORY FOR JOURNAL /BULK RLS.PTC WAS ADDRESSED TO MODIFY DESPATCH MODULE TO ACCEPT RLS WITHOUT BARCODE ALSO.PTC REPLIED ME ASSURING TO PREPARE JOURNALS WITH BARCODE.(EARLIER BOTH JOURNAL NO&STICKER NO AVAILABLE IN MANY RLS CREATED CONFUSION AS EACH RMS/PO NOTED ANY ONE OF THEM BUT DIFFERENTLY DEFEATING THE TRACKING PURPOSE.)

shortage of staff is the major problem.recruitment is rare.LR percentage is inadequate.training  for the purpose of statistics for trg centre unnecessary unconstitutional unlawful leave like ccl against fundamental right of equality is mischie vously included. no other dept/state/country/public or private concern indulged in such "plunder paul to donate peter " method. unlike in other depts like some branches in IT /taluk office welfare offices for example we cannot bundle days works or mails or SB  even for one day. some others may bundle for several weeks.no po can be locked even if there is no staff.all leave should have substitutes except cl acc.to rules/law if the work has to be carried out at once.leave without substitute lays the  addl. burden on remaining workers.see a story:
 two bullocks white and red came to a cart owner for job .the cart owner offered the job of pulling a cart by both. in return he provided  them grass, straw&water.he desired for more customers&more load for his business.he gave leave to red bullock mischievously/silently with no work full pay /food idea.many customers on seeing the overload on single bullock ,delay ,injustice left him.the white pulled the cart singly.the red claimed such a leave is its right and none can question.he was accusing the white for being slow for error&for loss of customers,revenue.the basic reason of not providing substitute or cancelling irregular leave is not understood. (i met such a treatment in a B class po and the case is in CAT)

IN MANY PLACES PROJECT ARROW COUNTERS SET UP WITH (WRONG VERITCAL) TABLE GLASSES CABINETS  ARE RECEIVED IN ONE SET -UP READYMADE.IN SOME PLACES CASH DRAWERS ARE PROVIDED AT THE BACK OF COUNTER CLERKS SO THAT CLERKS  CAN EASILY MISS/LOSE MONEY.IT IS VULNERABLE FOR THEFT.CHAIRS ACC.TO DOCTORS SHOULD HAVE ARMS,SUPPORT TO LOWER BACK TO AVOID BACKPAIN.BUT ARMLESS CHAIRS ARE PROVIDED.KEYBOARD SUPPORT GETS BROKEN IN MANY PLACES DUE TO UNMATCHING WEIGHT OF SUPPORT BOARD TO THE CHANNELS.IN BANKS BACKDOOR FOR EACH COUNTER,SMALL FAN,PLACE FOR PRINTERS ARE CONVENIENTLY PROVIDED.THE BASIC OF COUNTER IS TO COLLECT CASH SAFELY. SUCH BASIC LOGIC IS MISSING IN MANY HPO COUNTERS.WHO DESIGNED SO?PL RECTIFY

pl see discussion

At present when a disc.authority/sp issues a malicious charge sheet esp. against women appellate authority/dps revision authority cpmg can review even without appeal/petition.but these authorities who are expected  to act as almost judges quasi judicially  actually  act as if  in connaivance with each other ignoring justice even violating rules with indifference to the pains of staff.
cat judgement published in your bharathiya post in may illustrates this.sp issued a malicious chargesheet and punishment .For a RT date of relief or at least 1st move has to be mentioned in a RT order.only one order has to be issued. separate  so called relief order should not be issued in rt cases.oral relief orders in all gt cases are also not valid.rt should be made in april.in this case actually sp has violated all these rules and guidelines and he should have been chargesheeted for violations as they are proofs are corruption also.dps&cpmg failed to punish the sp ;instead upheld injustice which the cat
exposed and quashed.what did our union do usefully to punish the errant sps? and to help the victim who was deprived of 2yrs increment,macp,seniority etc?TThere is no provision to automatically punish a irrgular malicious sp. the rules when formed believed sps ;did not imagine sps will act malignantly and dps/cpmg will blindly connive.can the union take up such cases to add amendments to punish the errant/malignant authorities?will unio help /take up in defamation cases against them by creating alegal cell for innocent victims?pl note that even after 2 months in contempt of court the judgement is not implemented till date.

sir,men are not against ccl nor jealous.let the women get 20yrs ccl each or till retirement making the dept. bankrupt.men may not have right to question them. but when ccl vacancy-works are overloaded on the heads of men/others
victimising them,when even a single day cl cant be taken due to these shortages even for for vital reasons,or when men get punished/rebuked  by dept or public even while doing double duty or more,they get infuriated, have a right for equality fight.why leave for 18 yrs old child &not for aged parents or other dependents. men have look after aged parents acc. to law or it will be a crime( in tn)when i had a major surgery i did not have any spl leave even for self.with surgery pains i worked.
it is the duty of the family(beneficiary) of women staff to give rest to the women staff &not the duty of third members/public  to bear the burden or to get punished.let ccl be given as Lnd or exol engaging substitutes .( outsourcing people do the same job just for rs 200 or 100 per day without availing any leave even sunday)it will  hurt anyone.a former tn govt  was advocating
one employment for one family to tackle unemloyment & many such problems. many new comers after availing ml,ccl have fled for other depts after exploiting men in this way.(if central another 2yrs can be availed it seems)this ccl is misused in many qrs.
some sps may resort for corruption, some women may resort to part /full time job some contender for a particular post may prompt /force women at that post to go on ccl. these things are happening underground wasting tax payers money &exploiting labour of men.ccl punishes those who work &rewards who do not work

sir,
pl remember that 12 days cl is reduced to 8 days in the name of economy.
ccl is an eternal fetter to the development of anation. pl compare a company for example.if we own a company or this dept for imagination can we give so much leave with full pay leaving the customers&others suffer strangely?does all dept or all nations or companies follow this crazy procedure?if this ccl is given for example to electricity board or military staff where women are largely recruited or telecom staff without substitute pain will be felt on the spot.already one staff has 50 days leave( 30+10+10)with full pay every year.why this cannot be accumulared or availed as an adv Lnd?. in 2009 i took up the matter with human rights com,administrative reforms council endorsing a copy to the president.only acourt case can save the dept/nation

sir,
acc to constitution of india men and women have to be given equal facilities .i.e. in pay leave etc except in maternity leave.
now women staff outnumber gents staff considerably. already there is shortage of staff and consequent punishment or tortures everywhere.no other dept. or state govt seems to have given this ccl for 2 yrs. to women who have "children" upto 18 yrs of age. already this dept is running on loss sucking tax payers money. more than 90% of women employees husbands are employed.ccl is given upto chldrens 18 yrs for their examination admission,sickness.etc. if so men are more eligible to get ccl. any order that violates fundamental right of equality is invalid. if we approach court this ccl will be invalidated. men cant get even a single day cl. if thechilds admission is over in aday the women should not come to office for next14 days.what agreat rule.only by hard work the dept &nation thrive not for paying idleness overloading remaing staff, torturing customers creating overcrowd and delay or denial of service.is it not a legalised strike .can the dept /india survive such a huge loss of pay paid for idleness for almost each women?can we go for court?