Pages: 1 [ 2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
on: December 25, 2016, 10:37:28 pm
|
Started by rajasekaran - Last post by rajasekaran
|
TO DG DELHI Respected sir, pl ref m y petitions to DG dt 27.12.14 ,to honble President dt17.8.15 various letters RTIs reg illegal charge sheet Madras tribunal case 92/2013 and 533/2013 of Tribunal etc please furnish information for all the follwing points. 1.OA 92 ordered to follow rules and to give me a lawful logical reply on 17.1.13 Rules say shramdan should not be compelled (conduct rule 3C GID 6)But charge sheet was issued only on 22.2.13 for not doing shramdan (article 1).pl intimate names of those responsbile with addresses for not cancelling it till now from 2013 despite court orders. 2.pl intimate names and addresses of those responsible for suppressing motivatedly or otherwise in article 2 the orders of court in OA 92/2013 besides contempt of court and suppressing the insulting provoking and illegal words of Dirctor SMT Nirmaladevi. 3.pl intimate names and addresses of those responsible who dragged Gandhis name unwarrantedly or who linked unofficial labour to Gandhis name and my name to that labour. 4.Pl intimate details of those who still disobey the following a)conduct rule 3c gid 6 banning forcing of labour b)annexure in CCS CCA rule14 about merits of case deserving rule 14 c) Honble Tribunal order in OA 92/2013 d)in OA 533/2013 e)Rule45 of Postal Manual Vol III denying jurisdiction to higher officers like PMG f)Constitutional Article 21 ,23,42,43 5.Pl intimate action taken for the lie by SP Pattukottai during the enquiry that order from pmg was not supplied to mislead the case maliciously. 6.This lie itself prove the malicious motive to make illegal inquiry.Pl intimate action taken to cancel the illegal charges in the light of the above 7..Pl intimate action taken at each level to ensure justice. 8.Officiating SPOs can not issue charge sheet. But this was signed by Smt selvarani while officiating on 22.2.13. Pl intimate action taken for this irregularity and to cancel it. 9.Pl intimate details of those who want to continue it without cancelling it and the deails of higher officers responsible for this illegal charge sheet and continuing it
|
12
on: December 25, 2016, 10:35:52 pm
|
Started by rajasekaran - Last post by rajasekaran
|
From B.Rajasekaran M.A., APM (Retd) Tiruturaipoondi H.O TN Now@ 19,Rajampalayam st,Mannargudi -614001 To 1.The Director General&Secretary Posts, Department Of Posts, New Delhi 110001 2.The Pricipal Chief Postmaster General, T.N Circle , Chennai 600002 3.The Postmster General, Central Region, Trichi 620001 4. The Supdt Of P.O.S Pattukottai Division,Pattukottai 614601. Respected Madam/Sir, Sub:Irregular Continuation Of Charge Sheet For Shramdan against rule GID 6 of 3c Due To Wrong Information To Hon”Ble Tribunal &Defiance Of Court Orders&Rules 45 vol III By Ex PMG(Mr. Bahadur Singh)-Maliciously imaginary &Unlawful Instigation Letter By PTC Madurai Director against rule GID24 ,13 of Conduct rules Annexure in rule 14 Despite Strike Notice And A Suicide By A Trainee- suppression of it and rules Ref:1. Hon’ble Tribunal’s Orders In O.A 92/2013,533/2013&347/2014 2 RTI reply by PMG Trichi STB/48-1/12/TR DT 25.9.15 wr.t.RTI commissioner’s order CIC/BS/A/2014/002051/8543 DT 8.9.15 3.My Petitionto DG Posts dt 27.12.14 etc 4. My Petition to hon’ble President of India dt 17.8.15 5.My email dt 26.8.16 A few violations in charge sheet by SPOs are furnished below. 1(a).Shramdan is not all a duty. Nor 5.45 a.m is an office time.(Moreover I was asked to do bundling stappling of papers which is not the so called shramdan.DPS or anyone has no authority to order that against the constitution)Rules and OA 92 /2013 order dt17.1.13 were violated and defied by issuing charge sheet later on 22.2.13 treating voluntary shramdan as compulsory illegally by the Supdt of P.O.s. Pattukottai.Hence charge sheet is invalid and illegal. (b)Forcing Labour comes under Exploitation of labour and not under Conduct.Hence it is invalid and illegal.Director cannot order trainees to do physical labour at 5.45 a.m against dignity and illegally claim this labour as conduct.This is exploitation of labour against the constitution and against the Directive Priciples of decorum and fraternity. 2.Rule 45 of vol III and CCS CCA Rule 12 is violated as PMG ordered SPOs to issue charge sheet.(Earlier SPOs has lied that the PMG’s orders were not supplied and DPS has refused to supply this information .RTI Commissioner exposed it).So it is invalid and illegal.(This material evidence was suppressed from hon’ble Tribunal too.) 3. Charge sheet was issued by an officiating SPOs by Mrs Selvarani then against rule MHA No F7/14/61-Ests(A)dt.24.1.63.Hence it is invalid. 4.(a) Charge sheet was issued on the illegal instigation of Director PTC ,Madurai against conduct rules 3( c) Gid 6,24,13.(Gandhi’s name was unwarrantedly dragged and the full letter of Director acting like doctor ,ridiculing trainees’ giddiness as’ ransom’ etc in a mean and provoking language was suppressed.)Hence it is invalid and illegal. (b).It was issued after the all Tamilnadu Unions had announced strike against PTC Director’s such illegal activities and alleged inducing of suicide of Jayakumar my Training mate.Issuing charge sheet on such union matters is invalid according to DG’s order no DG(P)No.30-52/95-SR dt 6.10.95 5.The above material evidences were suppressed from court and false Reply statements were given in 533/2013 .Hence it is invalid. 6.OA 92/2013’s orders were also suppressed in charge sheet. No reply was sent to my representation dt 10.1.13 by PMG defying its order.PMG could not reply to it.Hence it is a contempt of court ,violation of rules and is invalid. 7.No Proper enquiry/action was taken against the Director for irregular discharge,irregular forcing shramdan,alleged inducing of suicide,irregular reporting about me.Hence as per court’s order to follow rules enquiry should have been done properly against the DPS concerned who violated laws after the transfer of the DPS to avoid tampering of evidences as in vol III &as demanded by unions. Hence it is illegal and amounts to abetting in violation of conduct rule 3©Gid 6,13.Hence Charge sheet is invalid. 8. Hon’ble Tribunal has ordered me in OA 533/2013 to send a representation to CPMG and ordered CPMG to dispose it lawfully with a reasoned speaking reply . But none of the points in my representation dt 7.10.13 were disposed or discussed lawfully,logically or speakingly. (a)In reply to my representation dt 7.10.13 the CPMG TN has falsely interpolated in its belated lr No.Vig/28-53/13 dt 10.1.14 as if I had written “The charge is not Proved” and that enquiry was needed . Actually I said “charges and enquiry are illegal and baseless”. Besides,CPMG did not discuss about illegal forcing of labour,illegal discharge, etc.Hence charge sheet is invalid and illegal. (b)The CPMG has also falsely and illogically said in Page 4 (d)“SPOs was not forced by “ PMG (only ordered) .Actually PMG’s order was exposed by RTI Commissioner.I worked under juniors without sensitive branches illegally and illogically as this problem was not dealt reasonably ,lawfully and speakingly by shirking responsibility defying Hon’ble Tribunal’s orders in O.A 533/2013 Hence Charge sheet is illegal and invalid. 9.None of the RTI queries dt3.8.15,8.8.15,11.8.15,19.11.15,&30.11.15 was properly replied in this regard and they are taken up by RTI commission again for enquiry. 10.SPOs can and has to accept and cancel the charge sheet according the above rules and court orders.Inquiry officer can also submit the report to SPOs that Charge sheet and consequent enquiry are illegal and invalid and against rules and first two court orders in 92&2013. If these orders had been followed already I would not have gone to court.I.O was also included as respondent by the advocate in a O.A.533 .I.O now quitted. (In the last case 347/2014 also same suppressions were made same violations were made.So the member without listening to my last submission of evidences has ordered in haste to finish case/enquiry within 6 months.(separate case is taken against this)My advocates want me to make a complaint and an appeal in high court which will be strict to take action against the offenders of law abettors suicide inducers etc ) 11. So far case is subjudice is given as a reason to wipe out the illegalities. .Now it is over.The illegalities and injustice may pl be stopped at once. Either I.O or SPOs can and has to cancel the case at once as per law and constitution.I was illegally ill-treated for past 3 years. Now major retiral dues are held up.This also violates fundamental right to life with dignity Directive Principles of Fraternity& dignity. While other DPSs have not forced shramdan this was illegally forced by Ms Nirmala Devi. Thus it is discriminatory and unconstitutional too. Kindly do the needful to cancel the case at once. Thanking You sir, Mannargudi Yours Faithfully, 14.9.16
|
13
on: December 25, 2016, 10:29:13 pm
|
Started by rajasekaran - Last post by rajasekaran
|
TO DG POSTS Respected sir, pl ref m y petitions to DG dt 27.12.14 ,to honble President dt17.8.15 various letters RTIs reg illegal charge sheet Madras tribunal case 92/2013 and 533/2013 of Tribunal etc please furnish information for all the follwing points. 1.OA 92 ordered to follow rules and to give me a lawful logical reply on 17.1.13 Rules say shramdan should not be compelled (conduct rule 3C GID 6)But charge sheet was issued only on 22.2.13 for not doing shramdan (article 1).pl intimate names of those responsbile with addresses for not cancelling it till now from 2013 despite court orders. 2.pl intimate names and addresses of those responsible for suppressing motivatedly or otherwise in article 2 the orders of court in OA 92/2013 besides contempt of court and suppressing the insulting provoking and illegal words of Dirctor SMT Nirmaladevi. 3.pl intimate names and addresses of those responsible who dragged Gandhis name unwarrantedly or who linked unofficial labour to Gandhis name and my name to that labour. 4.Pl intimate details of those who still disobey the following a)conduct rule 3c gid 6 banning forcing of labour b)annexure in CCS CCA rule14 about merits of case deserving rule 14 c) Honble Tribunal order in OA 92/2013 d)in OA 533/2013 e)Rule45 of Postal Manual Vol III denying jurisdiction to higher officers like PMG f)Constitutional Article 21 ,23,42,43 5.Pl intimate action taken for the lie by SP Pattukottai during the enquiry that order from pmg was not supplied to mislead the case maliciously. 6.This lie itself prove the malicious motive to make illegal inquiry.Pl intimate action taken to cancel the illegal charges in the light of the above 7..Pl intimate action taken at each level to ensure justice. 8.Officiating SPOs can not issue charge sheet. But this was signed by Smt selvarani while officiating on 22.2.13. Pl intimate action taken for this irregularity and to cancel it. 9.Pl intimate details of those who want to continue it without cancelling it and the deails of higher officers responsible for this illegal charge sheet and continuing it
COPY OF LR 14.9.16 ******************------------------------
From B.Rajasekaran M.A., APM (Retd) Tiruturaipoondi H.O TN Now@ 19,Rajampalayam st,Mannargudi -614001 To 1.The Director General&Secretary Posts, Department Of Posts, New Delhi 110001 2.The Pricipal Chief Postmaster General, T.N Circle , Chennai 600002 3.The Postmster General, Central Region, Trichi 620001 4. The Supdt Of P.O.S Pattukottai Division,Pattukottai 614601. Respected Madam/Sir, Sub:Irregular Continuation Of Charge Sheet For Shramdan against rule GID 6 of 3c Due To Wrong Information To Hon”Ble Tribunal &Defiance Of Court Orders&Rules 45 vol III By Ex PMG(Mr. Bahadur Singh)-Maliciously imaginary &Unlawful Instigation Letter By PTC Madurai Director against rule GID24 ,13 of Conduct rules Annexure in rule 14 Despite Strike Notice And A Suicide By A Trainee- suppression of it and rules Ref:1. Hon’ble Tribunal’s Orders In O.A 92/2013,533/2013&347/2014 2 RTI reply by PMG Trichi STB/48-1/12/TR DT 25.9.15 wr.t.RTI commissioner’s order CIC/BS/A/2014/002051/8543 DT 8.9.15 3.My Petitionto DG Posts dt 27.12.14 etc 4. My Petition to hon’ble President of India dt 17.8.15 5.My email dt 26.8.16 A few violations in charge sheet by SPOs are furnished below. 1(a).Shramdan is not all a duty. Nor 5.45 a.m is an office time.(Moreover I was asked to do bundling stappling of papers which is not the so called shramdan.DPS or anyone has no authority to order that against the constitution)Rules and OA 92 /2013 order dt17.1.13 were violated and defied by issuing charge sheet later on 22.2.13 treating voluntary shramdan as compulsory illegally by the Supdt of P.O.s. Pattukottai.Hence charge sheet is invalid and illegal. (b)Forcing Labour comes under Exploitation of labour and not under Conduct.Hence it is invalid and illegal.Director cannot order trainees to do physical labour at 5.45 a.m against dignity and illegally claim this labour as conduct.This is exploitation of labour against the constitution and against the Directive Priciples of decorum and fraternity. 2.Rule 45 of vol III and CCS CCA Rule 12 is violated as PMG ordered SPOs to issue charge sheet.(Earlier SPOs has lied that the PMG’s orders were not supplied and DPS has refused to supply this information .RTI Commissioner exposed it).So it is invalid and illegal.(This material evidence was suppressed from hon’ble Tribunal too.) 3. Charge sheet was issued by an officiating SPOs by Mrs Selvarani then against rule MHA No F7/14/61-Ests(A)dt.24.1.63.Hence it is invalid. 4.(a) Charge sheet was issued on the illegal instigation of Director PTC ,Madurai against conduct rules 3( c) Gid 6,24,13.(Gandhi’s name was unwarrantedly dragged and the full letter of Director acting like doctor ,ridiculing trainees’ giddiness as’ ransom’ etc in a mean and provoking language was suppressed.)Hence it is invalid and illegal. (b).It was issued after the all Tamilnadu Unions had announced strike against PTC Director’s such illegal activities and alleged inducing of suicide of Jayakumar my Training mate.Issuing charge sheet on such union matters is invalid according to DG’s order no DG(P)No.30-52/95-SR dt 6.10.95 5.The above material evidences were suppressed from court and false Reply statements were given in 533/2013 .Hence it is invalid. 6.OA 92/2013’s orders were also suppressed in charge sheet. No reply was sent to my representation dt 10.1.13 by PMG defying its order.PMG could not reply to it.Hence it is a contempt of court ,violation of rules and is invalid. 7.No Proper enquiry/action was taken against the Director for irregular discharge,irregular forcing shramdan,alleged inducing of suicide,irregular reporting about me.Hence as per court’s order to follow rules enquiry should have been done properly against the DPS concerned who violated laws after the transfer of the DPS to avoid tampering of evidences as in vol III &as demanded by unions. Hence it is illegal and amounts to abetting in violation of conduct rule 3©Gid 6,13.Hence Charge sheet is invalid. 8. Hon’ble Tribunal has ordered me in OA 533/2013 to send a representation to CPMG and ordered CPMG to dispose it lawfully with a reasoned speaking reply . But none of the points in my representation dt 7.10.13 were disposed or discussed lawfully,logically or speakingly. (a)In reply to my representation dt 7.10.13 the CPMG TN has falsely interpolated in its belated lr No.Vig/28-53/13 dt 10.1.14 as if I had written “The charge is not Proved” and that enquiry was needed . Actually I said “charges and enquiry are illegal and baseless”. Besides,CPMG did not discuss about illegal forcing of labour,illegal discharge, etc.Hence charge sheet is invalid and illegal. (b)The CPMG has also falsely and illogically said in Page 4 (d)“SPOs was not forced by “ PMG (only ordered) .Actually PMG’s order was exposed by RTI Commissioner.I worked under juniors without sensitive branches illegally and illogically as this problem was not dealt reasonably ,lawfully and speakingly by shirking responsibility defying Hon’ble Tribunal’s orders in O.A 533/2013 Hence Charge sheet is illegal and invalid. 9.None of the RTI queries dt3.8.15,8.8.15,11.8.15,19.11.15,&30.11.15 was properly replied in this regard and they are taken up by RTI commission again for enquiry. 10.SPOs can and has to accept and cancel the charge sheet according the above rules and court orders.Inquiry officer can also submit the report to SPOs that Charge sheet and consequent enquiry are illegal and invalid and against rules and first two court orders in 92&2013. If these orders had been followed already I would not have gone to court.I.O was also included as respondent by the advocate in a O.A.533 .I.O now quitted. (In the last case 347/2014 also same suppressions were made same violations were made.So the member without listening to my last submission of evidences has ordered in haste to finish case/enquiry within 6 months.(separate case is taken against this)My advocates want me to make a complaint and an appeal in high court which will be strict to take action against the offenders of law abettors suicide inducers etc ) 11. So far case is subjudice is given as a reason to wipe out the illegalities. .Now it is over.The illegalities and injustice may pl be stopped at once. Either I.O or SPOs can and has to cancel the case at once as per law and constitution.I was illegally ill-treated for past 3 years. Now major retiral dues are held up.This also violates fundamental right to life with dignity Directive Principles of Fraternity& dignity. While other DPSs have not forced shramdan this was illegally forced by Ms Nirmala Devi. Thus it is discriminatory and unconstitutional too. Kindly do the needful to cancel the case at once. Thanking You sir, Mannargudi Yours Faithfully, 14.9.16
|
14
on: December 25, 2016, 10:18:21 pm
|
Started by rajasekaran - Last post by rajasekaran
|
From B.Rajasekaran M.A., APM (Retd) Tiruturaipoondi H.O TN Now@ 19,Rajampalayam st,Mannargudi -614001 To 1.The Director General&Secretary Posts, Department Of Posts, New Delhi 110001 2.The Pricipal Chief Postmaster General, T.N Circle , Chennai 600002 3.The Postmster General, Central Region, Trichi 620001 4. The Supdt Of P.O.S Pattukottai Division,Pattukottai 614601. Respected Madam/Sir, Sub:Irregular Continuation Of Charge Sheet For Shramdan against rule GID 6 of 3c Due To Wrong Information To Hon”Ble Tribunal &Defiance Of Court Orders&Rules 45 vol III By Ex PMG(Mr. Bahadur Singh)-Maliciously imaginary &Unlawful Instigation Letter By PTC Madurai Director against rule GID24 ,13 of Conduct rules Annexure in rule 14 Despite Strike Notice And A Suicide By A Trainee- suppression of it and rules Ref:1. Hon’ble Tribunal’s Orders In O.A 92/2013,533/2013&347/2014 2 RTI reply by PMG Trichi STB/48-1/12/TR DT 25.9.15 wr.t.RTI commissioner’s order CIC/BS/A/2014/002051/8543 DT 8.9.15 3.My Petitionto DG Posts dt 27.12.14 etc 4. My Petition to hon’ble President of India dt 17.8.15 5.My email dt 26.8.16 A few violations in charge sheet by SPOs are furnished below. 1(a).Shramdan is not all a duty. Nor 5.45 a.m is an office time.(Moreover I was asked to do bundling stappling of papers which is not the so called shramdan.DPS or anyone has no authority to order that against the constitution)Rules and OA 92 /2013 order dt17.1.13 were violated and defied by issuing charge sheet later on 22.2.13 treating voluntary shramdan as compulsory illegally by the Supdt of P.O.s. Pattukottai.Hence charge sheet is invalid and illegal. (b)Forcing Labour comes under Exploitation of labour and not under Conduct.Hence it is invalid and illegal.Director cannot order trainees to do physical labour at 5.45 a.m against dignity and illegally claim this labour as conduct.This is exploitation of labour against the constitution and against the Directive Priciples of decorum and fraternity. 2.Rule 45 of vol III and CCS CCA Rule 12 is violated as PMG ordered SPOs to issue charge sheet.(Earlier SPOs has lied that the PMG’s orders were not supplied and DPS has refused to supply this information .RTI Commissioner exposed it).So it is invalid and illegal.(This material evidence was suppressed from hon’ble Tribunal too.) 3. Charge sheet was issued by an officiating SPOs by Mrs Selvarani then against rule MHA No F7/14/61-Ests(A)dt.24.1.63.Hence it is invalid. 4.(a) Charge sheet was issued on the illegal instigation of Director PTC ,Madurai against conduct rules 3( c) Gid 6,24,13.(Gandhi’s name was unwarrantedly dragged and the full letter of Director acting like doctor ,ridiculing trainees’ giddiness as’ ransom’ etc in a mean and provoking language was suppressed.)Hence it is invalid and illegal. (b).It was issued after the all Tamilnadu Unions had announced strike against PTC Director’s such illegal activities and alleged inducing of suicide of Jayakumar my Training mate.Issuing charge sheet on such union matters is invalid according to DG’s order no DG(P)No.30-52/95-SR dt 6.10.95 5.The above material evidences were suppressed from court and false Reply statements were given in 533/2013 .Hence it is invalid. 6.OA 92/2013’s orders were also suppressed in charge sheet. No reply was sent to my representation dt 10.1.13 by PMG defying its order.PMG could not reply to it.Hence it is a contempt of court ,violation of rules and is invalid. 7.No Proper enquiry/action was taken against the Director for irregular discharge,irregular forcing shramdan,alleged inducing of suicide,irregular reporting about me.Hence as per court’s order to follow rules enquiry should have been done properly against the DPS concerned who violated laws after the transfer of the DPS to avoid tampering of evidences as in vol III &as demanded by unions. Hence it is illegal and amounts to abetting in violation of conduct rule 3©Gid 6,13.Hence Charge sheet is invalid. 8. Hon’ble Tribunal has ordered me in OA 533/2013 to send a representation to CPMG and ordered CPMG to dispose it lawfully with a reasoned speaking reply . But none of the points in my representation dt 7.10.13 were disposed or discussed lawfully,logically or speakingly. (a)In reply to my representation dt 7.10.13 the CPMG TN has falsely interpolated in its belated lr No.Vig/28-53/13 dt 10.1.14 as if I had written “The charge is not Proved” and that enquiry was needed . Actually I said “charges and enquiry are illegal and baseless”. Besides,CPMG did not discuss about illegal forcing of labour,illegal discharge, etc.Hence charge sheet is invalid and illegal. (b)The CPMG has also falsely and illogically said in Page 4 (d)“SPOs was not forced by “ PMG (only ordered) .Actually PMG’s order was exposed by RTI Commissioner.I worked under juniors without sensitive branches illegally and illogically as this problem was not dealt reasonably ,lawfully and speakingly by shirking responsibility defying Hon’ble Tribunal’s orders in O.A 533/2013 Hence Charge sheet is illegal and invalid. 9.None of the RTI queries dt3.8.15,8.8.15,11.8.15,19.11.15,&30.11.15 was properly replied in this regard and they are taken up by RTI commission again for enquiry. 10.SPOs can and has to accept and cancel the charge sheet according the above rules and court orders.Inquiry officer can also submit the report to SPOs that Charge sheet and consequent enquiry are illegal and invalid and against rules and first two court orders in 92&2013. If these orders had been followed already I would not have gone to court.I.O was also included as respondent by the advocate in a O.A.533 .I.O now quitted. (In the last case 347/2014 also same suppressions were made same violations were made.So the member without listening to my last submission of evidences has ordered in haste to finish case/enquiry within 6 months.(separate case is taken against this)My advocates want me to make a complaint and an appeal in high court which will be strict to take action against the offenders of law abettors suicide inducers etc ) 11. So far case is subjudice is given as a reason to wipe out the illegalities. .Now it is over.The illegalities and injustice may pl be stopped at once. Either I.O or SPOs can and has to cancel the case at once as per law and constitution.I was illegally ill-treated for past 3 years. Now major retiral dues are held up.This also violates fundamental right to life with dignity Directive Principles of Fraternity& dignity. While other DPSs have not forced shramdan this was illegally forced by Ms Nirmala Devi. Thus it is discriminatory and unconstitutional too. Kindly do the needful to cancel the case at once. Thanking You sir, Mannargudi Yours Faithfully, 14.9.16
|
15
on: November 30, 2016, 09:56:04 am
|
Started by nitin - Last post by nitin
|
Some people may disagree with me on this subject.we can discuss about Story of Misuse. For last few years, India Post employees and its customers were repeatedly hearing the word “change” and everyone was waiting for that change. Especially India Post employees had so much of expectations in IT Modernization Project 2012. When we hear, or see the name, IT Modernization Project, normally we think of replacement of computers and other hardware or its upgradation. But everything happened in India Post except change of hardware. Everyone is speaking about various project of India Post incurring billions of rupees but nobody is sure about the exact amount. Some reliable source says that it is approximately 4000 or 4900 crore rupees. Anyway, I am not going for an assessment of the project amount because it is beyond our limit. I am focusing on some limited areas where we can assess the cost factor and its return. Whether it is 4000 Crore or 4900 Crore, one thing is sure that the amount is so big and it is almost sufficient to meet the modernization requirement of India Post. But when we come to the reality, the project implementation is lagging due to shortage of fund. Otherwise the old systems could have been replaced with new one. From the study, it is clear that something wrong happened in the spending pattern of India Post in connection with IT Modernization project. But I am not ready to call it as “India Post Scam” because I am not competent to do so and it is unfair that I am acting like CAG. You can decide whether it is a scam or not after reading remaining paragraphs. for more detail pls visit on below address http://www.speakpost.com/2016/11/luxury-in-deficit-pushed-india-post-into-crisis.html
|
16
on: March 16, 2016, 01:29:44 pm
|
Started by gobinda chandra - Last post by gobinda chandra
|
In violation of labour act, the System Administrators in Postal Department are asked to work continuously throughout day and night in the name of CBS migration of a particular office to be completed within a stipulated time. Neither they are financially benefited nor in the lieu of their hard work are they not provided to avail suitable off. Thereby they are harassed and frustrated to work.
1. Initially the singlehanded offices without Sanchaypost package. But all of a sudden in the name of CBS basing on data fed by Infosys which is full of error,/HOSB data were migrated for which official working at the bottom level are crying. Since the data has been migrated without balance agreement, proper checking, and customers facing officials being abused and threatened by the customers. There is every chances of huge for in future.
2. Sify connectivity is not working properly for which officials are forced to detain and to discharge their duties after office hours most of the days. It is learnt that, CBS central server seems unresponsive most of the days, for which officials facing unnecessary public pressure. Offices have not been provided with proper infrastructure like LaserJet printers, compatible systems for CBS. 256 KBPS bandwith is not enough for SOs and needs to be upgraded for Finacle and McCamish.Most of offices are running with NSP2 connectivity which needs to be equipped with NSP1 before migration.
3. One basic understanding which is lacking among our System Administrators is that in a Globalised economy Technology Induction will always be oriented towards displacement of Man-power. Do you agree with this or not? In such scenario we System Administrators are also not exception. Department has the agenda of displacing the crucial role played by the System Administrators in by using us against us. Please understand the tactics played by the department.
4. In many regions the PMGs CPMG have already started to churn out the next generation slaves (NO Holiday or Sunday). Yes. The newly identified System Administrators from the newly recruited PAs. Yes, this is nothing but continue this exploitation for the next few years. Are we not responsible to put a FULL STOP for this exploitation.Administrations only wants to implement new packages ignoring practical problems faced by the grass root level employees. Immediately suitable steps may kindly be taken by the authority.
GOVINDA CHRAN KUMAR
|
17
on: February 12, 2016, 12:23:27 pm
|
Started by dinesh.5971 - Last post by dinesh.5971
|
Sir, any instruction or circular about force fake account open practice adopted by the officer in so many division ?
|
18
on: November 10, 2015, 07:18:53 am
|
Started by chauhan.dop74vaishali - Last post by chauhan.dop74vaishali
|
Kindly clear that the strike on 1 & 2 December still stands. Raghavendra kumar Divisional Seceretary AIPEu3,Vaishali Division Hajipur Vaishali Bihar
|
19
on: September 29, 2015, 09:23:51 am
|
Started by chauhan.dop74vaishali - Last post by chauhan.dop74vaishali
|
Res sir, I am happy to inform you that i am selected as Div. Sec.,Vaishali Division Hajipur on 20.9.15.Kindly inform me about dues amount of Chq quota & bhartiye post amount up to 2014-15.(up to March-15) For future donation of Chq quota and all papers & bhartiye post send to me on my address i.e.:- Raghavendra kumar Postal assistant (Div. Sec) Hajipur HPO,Vaishali ,Bihar Pin-844101 Mob:-09939854640
|
20
on: May 18, 2015, 09:47:23 am
|
Started by rajsakha - Last post by rajsakha
|
Sir, what are new facilities to physically handicapped employee in 7th pay commission demanded by our union ?
|
Pages: 1 [ 2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |